Eredan's World

Banker999 · 23-08-2012 10:26:58

Get to the point..
With the new character of Witchblade(Nadarya)
I wondering what is the best line up for WB now

I have 2 alternatives,and i have analyze with both line up

1.
Anazra
Nadarya
Ylliana

Pro:
their attack is insane.
The attack of nadarya is almost equal with abom(8/14)
the others att is not bad too(6/11)

the turn bonus synchronization is good

Cons:
they can be OHK easily
ylliana spirit is low

conclusion:
i think this is more like for physical WB and should be played more offensive

2.
Anazra
Nadarya
Naya

Pro:
with their health upgraded by 1, they can't OHK easily
Their spirit is better than the first line up(all of their spirit is 2), that makes combo WB armor last action or other combo is more versatile

their turn bonus synchronization is good too

Cons:
their att is no good(anazra 6/9, naya 6/10, nadarya 8/12)

conclusion:
i think this more like for magical attack and should be played more defensive

so what do you think about the best line up currently for WB now with cards there right now?
and why do you choose that?

Dernière modification par Banker999 (23-08-2012 10:27:25)

Stormholt · 23-08-2012 12:38:51

I'll go for the 1st, The Spirit of Ylliana is low, however, on my WB deck, i use RoDs, but i think that Wather Wave do a close damage, and it don't depend of the spirit... And Yiliana low 4> spirit, this is great aganist mages... I like a offensive strategy, so i go n 1...

And well, even the name of Nadarya replace Naya, just add some "dar" to it xD
Just like the name Absalon replace Arkalon '-'

limweishun · 23-08-2012 13:38:55

I'm going with 2. I'm planning on playing RoD and Dragon's Breath along with Magic Servant. Since I'm recycling the magic spells (hopefully), the extra spirit will come in handy.

I'm also playing witchblade trump to boost my minimum attack, adding secret weapon to that, it's pretty much a +5 attack card. So i don't think physical attacks would be a problem here.

phaustus · 23-08-2012 19:54:06

I'd go with 3!

Naw, seriously.

Nadarya
Naya
Yliana

You lose the Naya/Anazra bonus, but Naya is tri-classed, meaning she will both chain and activate the blade immediately (if you chose to include it in your deck), which could be interesting. She also has more HP and a better order bonus than Anazra (but you do lose on the +2 atk to other WBs).

Otherwise, you could go with #1.

I don't think you should pass up on Yliana, as I feel she's the strongest WB, besides the new one.

Dernière modification par phaustus (23-08-2012 19:54:28)

DaRkStAr666 · 23-08-2012 21:21:43

[card]nadarya[/card] is as bad as she is ugly!

phaustus · 23-08-2012 21:55:01

DaRkStAr666 a écrit :

[card]nadarya[/card] is as bad as she is ugly!

So a WB with 2 more attack than all other existing WBs, with a double marauder bonus, that draws extra cards and lowers your opponent's defense, in addition to having a decent, easy to trigger order bonus is bad?

Then I guess the rest of the WB cast is complete and utter crap >_>

Wolvos · 23-08-2012 22:04:19

1º line up its the updated one, and you can play with more physical dmg than the 2º one

just put withcblade trump + magic attack / secret weapon with nadarya
you can do 12 to 16 dmg or more

nadarya its hard to 1 shot, because her order bonus (defensive order bonus for a offensive deck -.-)

ylliana provides a more luck to your game, i played 10 hours in arrow with anazra, naya and ylliana and sometimes you can kill the enemy only playing rod, but this happens very rarely, the only good effect of ylliana its the -2 to 4 spirit or more

naya its only good to play this card [card]the calling[/card] and to skip general fray
her attack its dumb for a rare character, her order bonus its impossible to play

i like more ylliana, helps a lot vs dragon breath and thunder decks

DaRkStAr666 · 24-08-2012 00:12:54

phaustus a écrit :

DaRkStAr666 a écrit :
[card]nadarya[/card] is as bad as she is ugly!
So a WB with 2 more attack than all other existing WBs,

if you play her instead of anazra.. you will lose 2 attack for the other chars.
if you play her instead of ylliana.. you will also lose 2x 0/2 atk.
if you play her instead of naya.. you are just stupid ^_^

with a double marauder bonus

its okay

that draws extra cards

crap

and lowers your opponent's defense

yeah its okay, but i dont have much marauder cards in the deck..

in addition to having a decent, easy to trigger order bonus is bad?

the bonus is bad

Dernière modification par DaRkStAr666 (24-08-2012 00:14:48)

Wolvos · 24-08-2012 00:27:46

DaRkStAr666 a écrit :

phaustus a écrit :
DaRkStAr666 a écrit :
[card]nadarya[/card] is as bad as she is ugly!
So a WB with 2 more attack than all other existing WBs,
if you play her instead of anazra.. you will lose 2 attack for the other chars.
if you play her instead of ylliana.. you will also lose 2x 0/2 atk.
if you play her instead of naya.. you are just stupid ^_^
with a double marauder bonus
its okay
that draws extra cards
crap
and lowers your opponent's defense
yeah its okay, but i dont have much marauder cards in the deck..
in addition to having a decent, easy to trigger order bonus is bad?
the bonus is bad

just look at this

this is a real marauder (order bonus: offensive, abilities: offensive AND good healt the funny thing, same rarity, old character)

ylliana helps a lot against blast, thunder pirates, runic priest, shadow mages and tsoutai, her only weakness its the 1 spirit point

the only bonus of naya is +1 hp at start of the game, she has the worst damage

Dernière modification par Wolvos (24-08-2012 00:32:47)

ioxygen · 24-08-2012 02:08:34

i'd go with 1st lineup. i think witchblades are made for offense. i mean compared to dks, they don't last very long since their armour just pretty much gives 2def and a double clay for def 4. but dks can do better at survivability and buffers. so witches have more potential in dealing highest dmg at once.

i think nardaya's replacing naya is a good selection. although it leaves all your witches 1 hp less at the start. but offensive power is greater and helps you focus on the kill. and i agree naya's turn bonus is 1/10 to achieve. and the drawing of 1 extra card isn't so bad for nardaya. i mean for variety in choices for plan of attack.

Nurvus · 24-08-2012 02:21:51

Wolvos, Naya is warrior+marauder+mage.
If you make a deck where you don't use [card]Blade of the Witch[/card] or any card that benefits warrior, then sure, go ahead and replace Naya.

DaRkStAr666, maybe instead of trying to use the old strategy with new cards, contemplate a new strategy to go with the new WB?

Dernière modification par Nurvus (24-08-2012 02:24:00)

Cyanide · 24-08-2012 03:02:45

Just saying Nadarya is Ayradan (cough Eredan cough) spelled backwards.

DaRkStAr666 · 24-08-2012 09:59:45

Nurvus a écrit :

DaRkStAr666, maybe instead of trying to use the old strategy with new cards, contemplate a new strategy to go with the new WB?

no i hate changes..

Wolvos · 25-08-2012 07:02:48

Nurvus a écrit :

Wolvos, Naya is warrior+marauder+mage.
If you make a deck where you don't use [card]Blade of the Witch[/card] or any card that benefits warrior, then sure, go ahead and replace Naya.

there is no good strategy on have the a char with 5/9 dmg
and there is no good strategy in wb warriors (for now)

Eredan's World

Annonce

#1 23-08-2012 10:26:58

best line up for WB?

#2 23-08-2012 12:38:51

Re : best line up for WB?

#3 23-08-2012 13:38:55

Re : best line up for WB?

#4 23-08-2012 19:54:06

Re : best line up for WB?

#5 23-08-2012 21:21:43

Re : best line up for WB?

#6 23-08-2012 21:55:01

Re : best line up for WB?

#7 23-08-2012 22:04:19

Re : best line up for WB?

#8 24-08-2012 00:12:54

Re : best line up for WB?

#9 24-08-2012 00:27:46

Re : best line up for WB?

#10 24-08-2012 02:08:34

Re : best line up for WB?

#11 24-08-2012 02:21:51

Re : best line up for WB?

#12 24-08-2012 03:02:45

Re : best line up for WB?

#13 24-08-2012 09:59:45

Re : best line up for WB?

#14 25-08-2012 07:02:48

Re : best line up for WB?

Pied de page des forums