Eredan's World

DarkAvenger · 07-05-2012 15:33:14

Why don't remove the price limit you can sell cards, or at least change the way the limit goes up, this is leading to a shortage of cards in the market, an example is art of tracking since ppl can only sell it for 600 crystals, most of them don't sell it cause they think the card is worth more leading to the card. I'm trying to get the card for almost a month and only got one copy since i need five for my tracker two to evolve kotori and three for the deck. Yes and i'm checking the market regularly. And that's only my case i'm sure this is happening to a lot of people and with other cards.

If you don't want to change the price limit you can also make the market free so everyone can sell their card that you increase the number of people selling card, probably minimize this problem.

soulst3al3r · 07-05-2012 15:43:17

we tried a free market before and it didnt work... I hate the card shortages but i like the stability of card prices of this market than the previous market.

DarkAvenger · 07-05-2012 17:09:41

why didn't a free market work?

soulst3al3r · 07-05-2012 18:00:38

monopolies and ppl hiking cards up to absurd levels.

DarkAvenger · 07-05-2012 18:13:32

well this way isn't working either =/

Calandra · 07-05-2012 19:43:42

i m not sure where u see stable prices? and where was the price instable beforehand? in my opinion the limitation of cards in possesion was the biggest change and a quite succesfull one by the way... so why not decreasing it further... from 10 to 6... 6 because u cant put more then 3 cards in one deck and this way you can have 2 decks with 'that' card... hoarding would be reduced further...

another thing could be to finally start tracking IP-addresses, if not done already.... also keep a close eye on frequent transactions among ppl with strange prices or something... this way you can act individually against multiaccounts...

i m also against the price limitation... max price is such a stupid thing to have as it prevents getting crystals for other cards you need... thought behind that would be like 'my card X is worth at least triple of whats the price in the market... thus i wont sell it' which leads to a shortage in general...

furthermore to reduce the amount of crystals in game i would increase the tax to 15% instead of 10%... the 30% they once had led to a huge uproar which is totally understandable but 15% seems reasonable...

soulst3al3r · 07-05-2012 21:31:31

Calandra a écrit :

i m not sure where u see stable prices? and where was the price instable beforehand? in my opinion the limitation of cards in possesion was the biggest change and a quite succesfull one by the way... so why not decreasing it further... from 10 to 6... 6 because u cant put more then 3 cards in one deck and this way you can have 2 decks with 'that' card... hoarding would be reduced further...
another thing could be to finally start tracking IP-addresses, if not done already.... also keep a close eye on frequent transactions among ppl with strange prices or something... this way you can act individually against multiaccounts...
i m also against the price limitation... max price is such a stupid thing to have as it prevents getting crystals for other cards you need... thought behind that would be like 'my card X is worth at least triple of whats the price in the market... thus i wont sell it' which leads to a shortage in general...
furthermore to reduce the amount of crystals in game i would increase the tax to 15% instead of 10%... the 30% they once had led to a huge uproar which is totally understandable but 15% seems reasonable...

I meant stability in the sense that card prices don't really change as much as it did in the previous market. I still remember how Weapons at will changed from 6k to 15k in less than a week and fluctuate at the higher point.

Dernière modification par soulst3al3r (07-05-2012 21:33:01)

Calandra · 08-05-2012 07:24:51

isnt that still the case.... depending on the deckbuilding use of a card the value increases or decreases...

Nurvus · 08-05-2012 11:38:10

It's also linked to the rarity of a card.
Some uncommons seem more rare than others.

Furthermore...

Shadow Master is barely used, besides upgrading Yu Ling, and it costs 13-15k cx.
The Art of Tracking is used, yet it goes below 1k cx, despite also needing 2 to upgrade Kotori Kage.

The Marketplace rules seem broken.

God · 12-05-2012 03:15:01

I liked the old market better. There were always cards available and the price only went up as high as those buying would let it. If the price was too high, you just didn't buy it, someone would come along and sell it cheaper eventually. Some of us used to actually buy boosters because we could sell what we didn't want and buy what we did. . . but now, i don't buy big boosters anymore because I can't get what they are worth.

At the same time, in the old market . . . we could buy 10 of something in hopes that the price would go up and we could make a profit. I see nothing wrong with that. It keeps people playing the game regularly. It also keeps them putting money into the game so that they have the right to sell.

Free market pro's . . . more cards in market place, more crystals for the regular players, more variety in deck types.

Free market cons . . . higher prices

Socialistic market pro's . . . cheaper prices, less crystals in circulation.

Socialistic market cons . . . Less players buying big boosters, Less cards in market, less variety in decks due to the lack of available cards.

FREE THE MARKET ! ! !

This message brought to you by God!

Eredan's World

Annonce

#1 07-05-2012 15:33:14

Price limit

#2 07-05-2012 15:43:17

Re : Price limit

#3 07-05-2012 17:09:41

Re : Price limit

#4 07-05-2012 18:00:38

Re : Price limit

#5 07-05-2012 18:13:32

Re : Price limit

#6 07-05-2012 19:43:42

Re : Price limit

#7 07-05-2012 21:31:31

Re : Price limit

#8 08-05-2012 07:24:51

Re : Price limit

#9 08-05-2012 11:38:10

Re : Price limit

#10 12-05-2012 03:15:01

Re : Price limit

Pied de page des forums