Eredan's World

Nurvus · 10-01-2012 21:26:33

Here is an idea of a character:

EDIT: Card changed after feedback.
- The base attack might be lower, like 5/7 or even 4/6.
- Possibly Eclipse.

Favorite cards:
- [card]Dazzle[/card]
- [card]No Armor![/card]
- [card]Skyward Boots[/card]
- [card]He who can do more...[/card]
Please discuss.

Dernière modification par Nurvus (12-01-2012 17:43:37)

Anihilate · 11-01-2012 04:01:10

How about...

Spr: 2
Atk: 4/8
Def: 0
Hp: 17

Spirit +1 against mages.
-2 to physical damage suffered by "Badra"

Odd turns:
Attack -1 and Gain chain if you play a card limited to marauders.

I really, really disagree with allowing [card]He who can do more...[/card] +Dazzle on an any-turn basis.

No character reduces all damage by 2, so the idea of one is farfetched,especially concerning a cross class.

Other marauder priests are DJ and Kararine(non eclipse) They have offense oriented stats, and a defensive order/extra effect. So I figured it a decent idea to have your creation do a mix of both,

Nurvus · 11-01-2012 04:29:09

I don't think [card]He who can do more...[/card] is an attack penalty, per se.
It makes your attack = X. Not -X.
But maybe it does work as you say...

Spirit +1 if you play a Theurgy against Mages is intended, and my take on multi-class bonuses. It would be less of a passive bonus against mages and more of a tactical one.

Badra's turn order is a [card]Disappearance[/card].

I guess she could have:

2 Spirit
6/8 Attack
0 Defense
16 Health
Spirit +1 if you play a Theurgy against Mages.
Odd Turns: Attack -2 and -2 to damage suffered by "Badra".
Even Turns: Gain Chain if you play a Marauder card.

I think this way it is fair.

Dernière modification par Nurvus (11-01-2012 04:29:57)

Anihilate · 12-01-2012 01:22:54

Dazzle counters Demonic portal, so He who can do more is up the same alley.

Still say the 2 damage reduction is iffy.

Nurvus · 12-01-2012 01:53:14

Anihilate a écrit :

Dazzle counters Demonic portal, so He who can do more is up the same alley.
Still say the 2 damage reduction is iffy.

Sakina gives 1 damage reduction to all your Temple Guardians.
Master Mystic-Slayer reduces damage taken by 1 (without penalties) on turn order, plus magic damage taken by an additional 1 at all times.
---
With my counter suggestion you can't get all bonuses without having skyward boots, wich creates a dependance, making it quite fair.

Dernière modification par Nurvus (12-01-2012 01:54:17)

steeliebob · 12-01-2012 01:57:10

Nurvus a écrit :

I don't think [card]He who can do more...[/card] is an attack penalty, per se.
It makes your attack = X. Not -X.
But maybe it does work as you say...

I have used dazzle against Saphira the zil before. what is changed over is not the attack = 0
but rather the difference between your original attack and attack 0/0.

so your caracter would send over atk -6/8 over the opponent if he would use HWCDM and dazzle.

That is if I remember correctly.

Nurvus · 12-01-2012 02:03:01

steeliebob a écrit :

Nurvus a écrit :
I don't think [card]He who can do more...[/card] is an attack penalty, per se.
It makes your attack = X. Not -X.
But maybe it does work as you say...
I have used dazzle against Saphira the zil before. what is changed over is not the attack = 0
but rather the difference between your original attack and attack 0/0.
so your caracter would send over atk -6/8 over the opponent if he would use HWCDM and dazzle.
That is if I remember correctly.

If it works the way you say it does, it would send -6 Min Attack (-6/-0) only.
Enemy Max Attack would be unchanged.

Would be a nice combo, a little better than [card]Scroll of Frailty[/card] -> [card]Lucky Charm[/card], but only 1 character in the deck (Badra) would be able to use it anyway.
--

Loads of decks out there that do not use attack bonuses.

Dernière modification par Nurvus (12-01-2012 02:04:21)

steeliebob · 12-01-2012 02:24:22

Nurvus a écrit :

steeliebob a écrit :
Nurvus a écrit :
I don't think [card]He who can do more...[/card] is an attack penalty, per se.
It makes your attack = X. Not -X.
But maybe it does work as you say...
I have used dazzle against Saphira the zil before. what is changed over is not the attack = 0
but rather the difference between your original attack and attack 0/0.
so your caracter would send over atk -6/8 over the opponent if he would use HWCDM and dazzle.
That is if I remember correctly.
If it works the way you say it does, it would send -6 Min Attack (-6/-0) only.
Enemy Max Attack would be unchanged.
Would be a nice combo, a little better than [card]Scroll of Frailty[/card] -> [card]Lucky Charm[/card], but only 1 character in the deck (Badra) would be able to use it anyway.
--
Loads of decks out there that do not use attack bonuses.

Yes, Missed the little word `min` on the card right there. But don't quote me on it, it is been a while since i played immortals and dazzle, and its not like you face that effect all day. But dazzle against zil marauders always putted a smile on my face.

I like your card. At his point in my opinion, temple guardians have a big advantage hen you have to choose your nomad priests because of forced march, and I think your card might give a reason to add a non temple guardian priest into your deck. and with Djamena you can make a nice marauder priest combo that might be fun.

Nurvus · 17-01-2012 22:44:48

Anihilate a écrit :

I really, really disagree with allowing [card]He who can do more...[/card] +Dazzle on an any-turn basis.

Just to reinforce, only 1 character in the deck would be able to do that, and when you have a combo that involves 2 cards chained in a specific order that only one character can perform, it's not that much of an overpowered thing, because you can anticipate the opponent's moves.

Furthermore, Tsoutai (with Ayako) cannot have their Attack reduced, the 0/1 Courtesans or Casters give nothing, and Discard Decks will still have their way.

A [card]Demonic Portal[/card] deck can "undo" [card]Dazzle[/card] if [card]Break the Second Chain[/card] fetches [card]Demonic Portal[/card], or the opponent plays after you.

[card]Escaping Death[/card], [card]Above the Law[/card] and [card]Crown of the Border[/card] counter this.

Last but not least, we must accept the fact that - as far as I see it - new cards and decks bring different needs to the existing decks - it will always be so.

Dernière modification par Nurvus (17-01-2012 22:49:54)

Eredan's World

Annonce

#1 10-01-2012 21:26:33

Nomad Marauder - Badra

#2 11-01-2012 04:01:10

Re : Nomad Marauder - Badra

#3 11-01-2012 04:29:09

Re : Nomad Marauder - Badra

#4 12-01-2012 01:22:54

Re : Nomad Marauder - Badra

#5 12-01-2012 01:53:14

Re : Nomad Marauder - Badra

#6 12-01-2012 01:57:10

Re : Nomad Marauder - Badra

#7 12-01-2012 02:03:01

Re : Nomad Marauder - Badra

#8 12-01-2012 02:24:22

Re : Nomad Marauder - Badra

#9 17-01-2012 22:44:48

Re : Nomad Marauder - Badra

Pied de page des forums