Vous n'êtes pas identifié(e).
- Discussions : Actives | Sans réponse
Annonce
Eredan iTCG forums move. You can find them at this adress: http://forums.eredan.com/index.php.
Eredan GT forums stay here, the same for the old Eredan iTCG forums who pass in read only.
Les forums d'Eredan iTCG ont déménagés. Retrouvez-les à cette adresse : http://forums.eredan.com/index.php.
Les forums d'Eredan GT restent ici, ainsi que les anciens forums d'Eredan iTCG qui y seront toujours en lecture seule.
#1 26-08-2012 00:38:44
- Nurvus
- Gardien
- Inscription : 01-12-2010
- Messages : 2 526
Punishing the Unpure > Banish > Sol'ra's Anger > Frontal Assault
Like the title says, it was the opponent's initiative (Desert Nomad Boss), and the cards were played as follows:
Boss: [card]Punishing the Unpure [/card]
Me: [card]Banish[/card]
Boss: [card]Sol'ra's Anger[/card]
Me: [card]Frontal Assault[/card]
Correct order of events would be:
Boss attaches Punishing the Unpure
Banish ignores Sol'ra's Anger
Frontal Assault removes Punishing the Unpure (because Sol'ra's Anger was ignored)
What really happened was:
Boss attaches Punishing the Unpure
Banish ignores Sol'ra's Anger
Frontal Assault removes Sol'ra's Anger (even though Sol'ra's Anger was ignored)
So I'm guessing Sol'ra's Anger was considered "attached" even though it was ignored.
Please fix this bug.
Dernière modification par Nurvus (26-08-2012 00:40:10)
Hors ligne