Eredan's World

zweichii · 29-05-2012 07:27:38

usefull but not op..

Calandra · 29-05-2012 09:49:31

useful and OP...

zweichii · 29-05-2012 11:38:39

well what i aim is for it to be a 2nd layer of defense for the removal of items.. exclusively... preserving only the stats but not the effect... i forgot the "from items" term though. this way golem decks are not destroyed by a mere single freeze... but u need to remove this card first then freeze...

Calandra · 29-05-2012 12:23:11

not every deck is a mage deck... not every mage deck has a freeze... there is always one deck to beat your favorite... to close this weakness creates a situation in which you easily reach OPness...

skadooosh · 29-05-2012 12:25:13

you know lots of mage decks with no freeze...?
seriously?
especially with the new deckbuild rules...?

Calandra · 29-05-2012 12:34:06

the new deckbuild rule is how old? 2 hours? you can already see trends? awesome... you are my personal hero mr.skadooosh... and to answer your first awesome statement... yes... personally i m not running a freeze in my pirate mage deck... i ve seldom seen a freeze in OPilkim decks as they rely on killing before equiping items...

zweichii · 29-05-2012 12:51:48

^ you guys got a very heavy point... but on my side please hear me out.. im not taking the golems to the OP side..

Calandra a écrit :

not every deck is a mage deck... not every mage deck has a freeze... there is always one deck to beat your favorite... to close this weakness creates a situation in which you easily reach OPness...

im not talking about only freeze.. there are lots of cards that removes permanents, spells or actions.. having a card like this will give golem deck a piece of retaliation against that sort of cards... please remember that golems needs long preparation in order to be effective, building items and only items. mages can still death combo golems at turn 1 with 2 out of lets say 6 nuke cards on their deck compared to this 1 out of 20+ cards on a deck.

yes not every deck is a mage deck thats what gives light to heavy hitter decks ultimately like for example "the pack", compared to their enormous fast build up golem decks are a lot slower...

with the new deckbuild rule freeze, sliding, breaker and other cards alike are now easily inserted as utility cards on a deck..

Dernière modification par zweichii (29-05-2012 12:53:18)

skadooosh · 29-05-2012 12:56:43

zweichii a écrit :

with the new deckbuild rule freeze, sliding, breaker and other cards alike are now easily inserted as utility cards on a deck..

Thank you to point that out as Mr calandra seems not to have understood it...!

anyway, I don't think this card is so OP. Powerful, yes, but golems deck needs it...
anyway, I would not have given it a chain... (the card is already super good without it... )

Dernière modification par skadooosh (29-05-2012 13:01:38)

Stormholt · 29-05-2012 13:11:26

Hey how about that:

Selfdestruct:

Action-Unique-Mechanique-Golem
All the characters recife X/2 of direct damage where X is the number of cards atached to your character...

OP A LOT, but is for ALL the characters... But i see that this coudnt work, for example, a deck With Galene, S.A.R.A.H. and Announ-tho, announ-tho whould be alive... =/

zweichii · 29-05-2012 13:23:35

Stormholt a écrit :

Hey how about that:
Selfdestruct:
Action-Unique-Mechanique-Golem
All the characters recife X/2 of direct damage where X is the number of cards atached to your character...
OP A LOT, but is for ALL the characters... But i see that this coudnt work, for example, a deck With Galene, S.A.R.A.H. and Announ-tho, announ-tho whould be alive... =/

i can see what u wanted to happen but what if the opponent removed the attached cards before you can play that card..? thats what i want to give emphasis on my card idea... the huge impact of item removal cards on a golem deck... plus... an aoe direct damage card...might overdo it and ecstasy will thank you for that...

God · 29-05-2012 14:07:46

Try this instead . . .

Welding

Action/Craftsman/Golem

The item played as a chain becomes "welded" if played on a golem and can not be removed by any effect.

Chain:Item

-------------------------------------------------------------
This allows you to attach one item and not have it removed, while not leaving freeze as a useless card.

Neja.Persot.Spy · 29-05-2012 14:21:12

God a écrit :

Try this instead . . .
Welding
Action/Craftsman/Golem
The item played as a chain becomes "welded" if played on a golem and can not be removed by any effect.
Chain:Item
-------------------------------------------------------------
This allows you to attach one item and not have it removed, while not leaving freeze as a useless card.

much better ^^

Nurvus · 29-05-2012 23:19:00

God a écrit :

Try this instead . . .
Welding
Action/Craftsman/Golem
The item played as a chain becomes "welded" if played on a golem and can not be removed by any effect.
Chain:Item
-------------------------------------------------------------
This allows you to attach one item and not have it removed, while not leaving freeze as a useless card.

I like the idea.
I think it could have a "At the end of the fight 'Welding' returns to the Deck/Hand." as well, since you're spending 1 of 2 cards to turn an item (most of them are permanent already) into an unremovable permanent.

Eredan's World

Annonce

#1 29-05-2012 07:27:38

Golem Hug.

#2 29-05-2012 09:49:31

Re : Golem Hug.

#3 29-05-2012 11:38:39

Re : Golem Hug.

#4 29-05-2012 12:23:11

Re : Golem Hug.

#5 29-05-2012 12:25:13

Re : Golem Hug.

#6 29-05-2012 12:34:06

Re : Golem Hug.

#7 29-05-2012 12:51:48

Re : Golem Hug.

#8 29-05-2012 12:56:43

Re : Golem Hug.

#9 29-05-2012 13:11:26

Re : Golem Hug.

#10 29-05-2012 13:23:35

Re : Golem Hug.

#11 29-05-2012 14:07:46

Re : Golem Hug.

#12 29-05-2012 14:21:12

Re : Golem Hug.

#13 29-05-2012 23:19:00

Re : Golem Hug.

Pied de page des forums