I 2nd That, like it was said before, every deck has its strengths, and it's weakness, like i destroyed ecstacy decks with my noz mages, and even with my wild buds, & got whooped with my discard, and dh deck, stop crying 1 ecstacy costs 160k-170k, so everyone can't afford it....especially 3 at that.....their good, and they quick kill, but their not broken, so give it a rest plzzzzz!

CAPTUSA · 14-04-2012 12:01:46

skadooosh a écrit :

Norad IV a écrit :
heck why not nerf it to complete uselessness? I mean they do that with nomad decks everytime they get new cards, which I find hilarious because nomad decks are the most underpowered most easily countered decks.
I completely aggre with that...
when I look at the actual top elo deck. it seems that eclipse didn't need a nerf.
(not talking about avatar who would still be OP...)

how eclipse got nerfed??????????? i don't remember that!

Zurga · 14-04-2012 12:48:02

Try this :
http://blogus.eredan.com/index.php/2011 … ifications

Nurvus · 15-04-2012 02:17:10

When will Feerik start proper retroactive tweaking of cards?
Seriously...

So many cool cards should be tweaked.
Most importantly, increase initial damage of Shadow Master by 1!

Dernière modification par Nurvus (15-04-2012 02:19:43)

Sapphon · 15-04-2012 08:53:47

The problem of tweaking is that when you start to do it, the only thing players can think about is "nerf nerf nerf nerf nerf nerf" or "up up up up up". Look at the situation : since we did the second nerf batch, players ask for nerfs before they had a chance to test new cards. I'm pretty sure if we try to up just one card, everyone will flood the boards to ask for their favorite card's up ;p

Norad IV a écrit :

I mean they do that with nomad decks everytime they get new cards,

11 nomads' cards releases. 1 nerf. Yeah, right.

which I find hilarious because nomad decks are the most underpowered most easily countered decks.

You should really try to play the game before making all these stupid statements
These last 6 months there have not been a single week without at least 1 nomad deck in elo top ten. Not all the guilds can say the same.

al_vh1n · 15-04-2012 11:47:22

I don't support nerfing. I prefer releasing of counters for those so called op cards. But what Feerik keeps doing instead is they keep releasing more op cards to beat those op ones that already exist. I think in their mind that is the meaning of counter.

Player 1: I will use this card to kill you * +10 attack
Player 2: No you don't. I have a counter for that * +20 attack

So in the future we will see more releases of op decks to beat the current ones. Maybe they will release a card that will win you the game in the first turn to counter those who wins on the 3rd. So it is not impossible that soon most match-ups will only last for about 1-3 minutes w/ this current trend.

Izayoi · 15-04-2012 16:12:22

al_vh1n a écrit :

I don't support nerfing. I prefer releasing of counters for those so called op cards. But what Feerik keeps doing instead is they keep releasing more op cards to beat those op ones that already exist. I think in their mind that is the meaning of counter.
Player 1: I will use this card to kill you * +10 attack
Player 2: No you don't. I have a counter for that * +20 attack
So in the future we will see more releases of op decks to beat the current ones. Maybe they will release a card that will win you the game in the first turn to counter those who wins on the 3rd. So it is not impossible that soon most match-ups will only last for about 1-3 minutes w/ this current trend.

Once everyone's OP, no one will be.

MrLordi92 · 15-04-2012 19:02:52

Izayoi a écrit :

al_vh1n a écrit :
I don't support nerfing. I prefer releasing of counters for those so called op cards. But what Feerik keeps doing instead is they keep releasing more op cards to beat those op ones that already exist. I think in their mind that is the meaning of counter.
Player 1: I will use this card to kill you * +10 attack
Player 2: No you don't. I have a counter for that * +20 attack
So in the future we will see more releases of op decks to beat the current ones. Maybe they will release a card that will win you the game in the first turn to counter those who wins on the 3rd. So it is not impossible that soon most match-ups will only last for about 1-3 minutes w/ this current trend.
http://surbrook.devermore.net/adaptatio … ndrome.jpg
Once everyone's OP, no one will be.

Oh my, I believe you have made my morning with this post.

Norad IV · 18-04-2012 03:58:56

Sapphon a écrit :

The problem of tweaking is that when you start to do it, the only thing players can think about is "nerf nerf nerf nerf nerf nerf" or "up up up up up". Look at the situation : since we did the second nerf batch, players ask for nerfs before they had a chance to test new cards. I'm pretty sure if we try to up just one card, everyone will flood the boards to ask for their favorite card's up ;p
Norad IV a écrit :
I mean they do that with nomad decks everytime they get new cards,
11 nomads' cards releases. 1 nerf. Yeah, right.
which I find hilarious because nomad decks are the most underpowered most easily countered decks.
You should really try to play the game before making all these stupid statements
These last 6 months there have not been a single week without at least 1 nomad deck in elo top ten. Not all the guilds can say the same.

I've probably been playing longer than you have known about this game. My posts point out obvious money grab opportunities which I DESPISE in games. It should not be about "who can spend the most money" but rather who can compete the best without spending money. So please if you are going to be a moderator do not try to condescend me by saying I don't know what I am talking about when I have been around longer than since you were probably alive. I know what I am talking about k? (and oh please don't edit my post to say I am "troll is troll" again please, it makes you become a bad mod!)

soulst3al3r · 18-04-2012 04:12:54

@norad: you are talking to sapphon. He's staff, not a mod. Im sure he's been in this game longer than you

Stormholt · 18-04-2012 04:41:50

Really, why dont nerf this card and end whit this sillyness?

Please, i'm serious, a lot of players complaim 'bout this card, ban torment and dismembrament on elo, wont gonna fix the poblem!There's still a lot of players that give up the game, to loose by decks like these!

I dont gonna say anything more, 'cuz i know that i wont gonna be heard...This is bad
, gets me sad

Ryken · 18-04-2012 05:03:09

Norad IV a écrit :

Sapphon a écrit :
The problem of tweaking is that when you start to do it, the only thing players can think about is "nerf nerf nerf nerf nerf nerf" or "up up up up up". Look at the situation : since we did the second nerf batch, players ask for nerfs before they had a chance to test new cards. I'm pretty sure if we try to up just one card, everyone will flood the boards to ask for their favorite card's up ;p
Norad IV a écrit :
I mean they do that with nomad decks everytime they get new cards,
11 nomads' cards releases. 1 nerf. Yeah, right.
which I find hilarious because nomad decks are the most underpowered most easily countered decks.
You should really try to play the game before making all these stupid statements
These last 6 months there have not been a single week without at least 1 nomad deck in elo top ten. Not all the guilds can say the same.
I've probably been playing longer than you have known about this game. My posts point out obvious money grab opportunities which I DESPISE in games. It should not be about "who can spend the most money" but rather who can compete the best without spending money. So please if you are going to be a moderator do not try to condescend me by saying I don't know what I am talking about when I have been around longer than since you were probably alive. I know what I am talking about k? (and oh please don't edit my post to say I am "troll is troll" again please, it makes you become a bad mod!)

There is so much wrong with this post it's not even funny. So I'll keep it simple; don't like it, don't play. There are no other arguments for you, since in most of the posts I've seen you in are you complaining about something or other. Are some of them valid? Ehhh...probably not. But even if they were, who cares? The game is free until one chooses it not to be.

Walk away man. Walk away.

BTW, the "It should not be about "who can spend the most money" but rather who can compete the best without spending money." line got me laughing. If that's the case, why have the option to buy cards at all? Then we could all be on equal ground, right? Except, not. Because then the new players would be contending with people that have been in the game since the beginning and have tons of great cards, while they have nothing. See the logic in that?

Eredan's World

Annonce

#1 08-04-2012 03:14:42

ecstasy should not incorporate AOE damage

#2 09-04-2012 06:07:40

Re : ecstasy should not incorporate AOE damage

#3 09-04-2012 10:54:12

Re : ecstasy should not incorporate AOE damage

#4 09-04-2012 15:24:43

Re : ecstasy should not incorporate AOE damage

#5 09-04-2012 15:37:57

Re : ecstasy should not incorporate AOE damage

#6 09-04-2012 16:41:08

Re : ecstasy should not incorporate AOE damage

#7 09-04-2012 16:53:16

Re : ecstasy should not incorporate AOE damage

#8 09-04-2012 17:06:12

Re : ecstasy should not incorporate AOE damage

#9 10-04-2012 09:20:30

Re : ecstasy should not incorporate AOE damage

#10 10-04-2012 11:42:16

Re : ecstasy should not incorporate AOE damage

#11 11-04-2012 04:21:32

Re : ecstasy should not incorporate AOE damage

#12 11-04-2012 04:57:30

Re : ecstasy should not incorporate AOE damage

#13 11-04-2012 08:17:49

Re : ecstasy should not incorporate AOE damage

#14 14-04-2012 12:00:19

Re : ecstasy should not incorporate AOE damage

#15 14-04-2012 12:01:46

Re : ecstasy should not incorporate AOE damage

#16 14-04-2012 12:48:02

Re : ecstasy should not incorporate AOE damage

#17 15-04-2012 02:17:10

Re : ecstasy should not incorporate AOE damage

#18 15-04-2012 08:53:47

Re : ecstasy should not incorporate AOE damage

#19 15-04-2012 11:47:22

Re : ecstasy should not incorporate AOE damage

#20 15-04-2012 16:12:22

Re : ecstasy should not incorporate AOE damage

#21 15-04-2012 19:02:52

Re : ecstasy should not incorporate AOE damage

#22 18-04-2012 03:58:56

Re : ecstasy should not incorporate AOE damage

#23 18-04-2012 04:12:54

Re : ecstasy should not incorporate AOE damage

#24 18-04-2012 04:41:50

Re : ecstasy should not incorporate AOE damage

#25 18-04-2012 05:03:09

Re : ecstasy should not incorporate AOE damage

Pied de page des forums