Eredan's World

Majyqman · 22-01-2013 10:00:42

Now, true, all my characters have the same number of corruptions.... but none have any ATTACHED...

So how does the receptacle still get to do damage?

(if you're wondering how... tempus and I choose the receptacle first)

Zurga · 22-01-2013 10:37:37

If all yours characters have 0 corruptions, the one with most corruption has 0 corruption.
If you use Tempus, first turn is turn 2, Receptacle uses his order and one of your character with 0 corruption (most of corruption attached) received 4 damage.
There is no indication that you should have a corruption attached to trigger the order of Receptacle.

No bug here in this description.

Majyqman · 22-01-2013 11:58:01

Zurga a écrit :

If all yours characters have 0 corruptions, the one with most corruption has 0 corruption.
If you use Tempus, first turn is turn 2, Receptacle uses his order and one of your character with 0 corruption (most of corruption attached) received 4 damage.
There is no indication that you should have a corruption attached to trigger the order of Receptacle.
No bug here in this description.

Except that the receptacle says "with the most corruptions attached" can a character with zero attached corruptions belong to a set [corruptions attached] in order to be the one with the most?

Not how it's written in english.

Or put it this way, if I said you had to give your $1000 to the person with the most apples in their hand... and 3 people were holding out empty hands... do you think you would have to give the money to anyone?

No. And that's why this is either written wrong or working wrong. I guess I'm not privy to how it was intended to work (nor do I expect it would be admitted) but in which case the wording needs work.

Dernière modification par Majyqman (22-01-2013 12:02:08)

Zurga · 22-01-2013 12:52:31

I disagree with your interpretation.

I'm not as good as you with the English language.
I don't argue on the wording itself.

All characters are in the set of [attached corruptions] at any time. When times come to know who has the most corruptions attached, first is counted for 0, second is counted for 0, third is counted for 0.
The greatest number is 0, the damage are done on one random character.

I believe that the way the card is designed, it's compliant with the French wording.
Perhaps, the English one should be modified to be more accurate on what the card does.

Eredan's World

Annonce

#1 22-01-2013 10:00:42

Nehantic Receptacle vs Zero Corruptions

#2 22-01-2013 10:37:37

Re : Nehantic Receptacle vs Zero Corruptions

#3 22-01-2013 11:58:01

Re : Nehantic Receptacle vs Zero Corruptions

#4 22-01-2013 12:52:31

Re : Nehantic Receptacle vs Zero Corruptions

Pied de page des forums