Eredan's World

Jao · 20-10-2012 18:17:53

just asking so i can begin to construct my deck

MrLordi92 · 21-10-2012 08:49:22

Probably Multi-Attack. Ragnor, Pilferess, and Silikat.

Or some sort of World-Tree deck? I don't know. The new character seems okay. Maybe Cervus, Hundawa, and warrior Keizan.

Then there's the mage deck. Mage Keizan, F'ey, and Eikytan? This one's probably the weakest out of the three, but they're the only three decks I can think of with Sap Hearts other than Ourenos.

Jao · 21-10-2012 19:22:19

no cookie cutter builds you can suggest? is wild buds outdated? that's the deck that comes out in my search.

MrLordi92 · 22-10-2012 04:01:49

I don't think its as good as it used to be. As for cookie cutter builds... What's the fun in that? I suggest opening up Notepad and typing down some cards you'd want to use, and put they're prices with them and how many you'd want to use. It helps me in deck building.

Jao · 22-10-2012 07:40:33

i'm looking for cookie cutter builds so i have something to start with. and then go from there. as a beginner, and with the amount of card in this game, it would take me a while before i get to know all cards. that's a lot of work to construct a deck.

while if i start out with cookie cutter builds, i can learn the game from then on, and modify as needed. later, i can make my own builds. i really just want something to start with.

so what's the fun in doing a lot of work? i ask a question, if you don't want to answer, don't post. it annoys me when i ask a direct question and ppl will answer with: google it moron, or search it yourself.

why bother answering at all?

your idea of fun is different from my idea of fun.

ioxygen · 22-10-2012 08:17:25

MrLordi92 a écrit :

I suggest opening up Notepad and typing down some cards you'd want to use, and put they're prices with them and how many you'd want to use. It helps me in deck building.

Yea MrLordi92's suggestion is good, I used to do it when starting out using Kotobas and taking note of the market's average prices in order to construct a deck that would not take too much but fair well in average play. I mean just starting out right?

The playable cards doesn't go by what your level but by the amount you can afford and depending on your preferred style of play as well. So if you like mages - go for World tree mages. If you like a Tri-race deck - go for the tri-race mentioned in the post above, they're not too expensive. If you like warriors - well there are alot of warriors since Saps has no marauders. You can choose the Elfines, Hom chais or Dais/World Trees.

You can try playing with others in pvp to see their builds and how they are effective if you're searching for cookie cutters.

MrLordi92 · 23-10-2012 04:42:10

Jao a écrit :

i'm looking for cookie cutter builds so i have something to start with. and then go from there. as a beginner, and with the amount of card in this game, it would take me a while before i get to know all cards. that's a lot of work to construct a deck.
while if i start out with cookie cutter builds, i can learn the game from then on, and modify as needed. later, i can make my own builds. i really just want something to start with.
so what's the fun in doing a lot of work? i ask a question, if you don't want to answer, don't post. it annoys me when i ask a direct question and ppl will answer with: google it moron, or search it yourself.
why bother answering at all?
your idea of fun is different from my idea of fun.

If you're looking for cookie cutter builds, then search for them. There's a search function on this site, you know. Do you know how troublesome and annoying it is to post a whole basic deck list for people who are too lazy to look for it themselves.

Here. Go here so you can look at some basic builds and see what you can come up with on your own. http://eitcg.tk/deck_all.php

Jao · 24-10-2012 11:57:13

i would search for it if the search function isn't broken. have you tried the search? i suggest you do.

do you know how stupid it is to post a reply saying it is too troublesome to post an answer and yet you post a reply anyway? in the time it took you to complain it is troublesome to answer properly, you would already have posted an answer instead of being a dick.

Dernière modification par Jao (24-10-2012 12:00:47)

Zurga · 24-10-2012 12:30:43

I tried lot of times and the search function on forum is perfectly correct.

Spify · 24-10-2012 13:15:44

Hmm... the search function...I was thinking about this topic for a long time now as in many posts you find this "Use the search function" reply.
Yes guys, search function does work and can help you to some extent but the truth is this search function is not exactly google search. Most of the returned results are useless and irrelevant. This applies when searching for more complex stuff using 2+ words. And as this forum is getting bigger and bigger (so is the number of returned useless results), finding what you need can be close impossible in many cases.
So yeah, you can suggest people to use 'search', but in the same time probably it's just easier to post a reply or a link with the solution instead of going anal to the guys asking some questions.

Peace

Dernière modification par Spify (24-10-2012 13:26:42)

Jao · 24-10-2012 15:11:23

Jao a écrit :

no cookie cutter builds you can suggest? is wild buds outdated? that's the deck that comes out in my search.

if he had read this previous post of mine, he'd have realized i've already used search.

Zurga · 24-10-2012 15:16:56

Stop to say the search function is broken.

If you can't find what you want, two options :
- You are unable to make a proper search
- The answer you want doesn't exist

In the second case, create a thread in the decks and strategies part and propose your own build, you surely will have answers to improve your build.

MrLordi92 · 24-10-2012 18:47:08

Zurga a écrit :

I tried lot of times and the search function on forum is perfectly correct.

Same.

I gave you that website. Couldn't find anything on there you liked? That's almost like giving you a ton of cookie cutter builds all in one.

Dernière modification par MrLordi92 (24-10-2012 18:47:32)

Eredan's World

Annonce

#1 20-10-2012 18:17:53

what's the consensus top 3 decks for sap heart?

#2 21-10-2012 08:49:22

Re : what's the consensus top 3 decks for sap heart?

#3 21-10-2012 19:22:19

Re : what's the consensus top 3 decks for sap heart?

#4 22-10-2012 04:01:49

Re : what's the consensus top 3 decks for sap heart?

#5 22-10-2012 07:40:33

Re : what's the consensus top 3 decks for sap heart?

#6 22-10-2012 08:17:25

Re : what's the consensus top 3 decks for sap heart?

#7 23-10-2012 04:42:10

Re : what's the consensus top 3 decks for sap heart?

#8 24-10-2012 11:57:13

Re : what's the consensus top 3 decks for sap heart?

#9 24-10-2012 12:30:43

Re : what's the consensus top 3 decks for sap heart?

#10 24-10-2012 13:15:44

Re : what's the consensus top 3 decks for sap heart?

#11 24-10-2012 15:11:23

Re : what's the consensus top 3 decks for sap heart?

#12 24-10-2012 15:16:56

Re : what's the consensus top 3 decks for sap heart?

#13 24-10-2012 18:47:08

Re : what's the consensus top 3 decks for sap heart?

Pied de page des forums