Vous n'êtes pas identifié(e).
Eredan iTCG forums move. You can find them at this adress: http://forums.eredan.com/index.php.
Eredan GT forums stay here, the same for the old Eredan iTCG forums who pass in read only.
Les forums d'Eredan iTCG ont déménagés. Retrouvez-les à cette adresse : http://forums.eredan.com/index.php.
Les forums d'Eredan GT restent ici, ainsi que les anciens forums d'Eredan iTCG qui y seront toujours en lecture seule.
Everytime I do damage, it was the minimum attack!
The system is so unfair, it really pissed me off!!
Hors ligne
What do you suggest other than random?
We've all pulled the short straw before.
"Some say there's no subtly to destruction. You know what? They're dead." ~ Jaya Ballard, Task Mage
"One footstep among many is silent. One footstep alone is deafening."
Hors ligne
That's human..
When damage is always maximum in one game,he didn't complain..
When damage is always minimum in one game,he blamed the game..
Hors ligne
you can only blame your luck not the system have you seen two sacred novas hit 10 twice well i did
New englishchat: http://xat.com/EnglisheredanNeo---Online
"Tea is best enjoyed with your fellow monsters"
-Frederica Bernkastel
Hors ligne
how can luck-base system be unfair?
it makes u think more than just base attack system (ex:9 attack insted of 7/10)
personaly, i find it better this way
This is my rifle
This is my gun
This one's for fighting
This one's for fun
Hors ligne
Luck-based system is never fair. End of story. That's why people use decks that have set effects...and those decks own all others.
Hors ligne
Luck-based system is never fair. End of story. That's why people use decks that have set effects...and those decks own all others.
Incorrect!
People that know math own all others.
It is called odds calculation.
Hors ligne
Leorio a écrit :Luck-based system is never fair. End of story. That's why people use decks that have set effects...and those decks own all others.
Incorrect!
People that know math own all others.
It is called odds calculation.
oh dont mind him ttpk hes intellect is way superior to us lowbies so he doesnt know what hes talking about
New englishchat: http://xat.com/EnglisheredanNeo---Online
"Tea is best enjoyed with your fellow monsters"
-Frederica Bernkastel
Hors ligne
TPPK a écrit :Leorio a écrit :Luck-based system is never fair. End of story. That's why people use decks that have set effects...and those decks own all others.
Incorrect!
People that know math own all others.
It is called odds calculation.oh dont mind him ttpk hes intellect is way superior to us lowbies so he doesnt know what hes talking about
What he said is true. A good deck building is to improve the probability of you getting the cards you want for the effect you wanted. For example:
Multiple copies of Assassinate and Burning Soul for example, both gives +Attack and having 6 cards in a 20 card deck improves the chance for you to deal higher damage.
Magius [FH] FullHouse Clan
Hors ligne
jackal19 a écrit :TPPK a écrit :Incorrect!
People that know math own all others.
It is called odds calculation.oh dont mind him ttpk hes intellect is way superior to us lowbies so he doesnt know what hes talking about
What he said is true. A good deck building is to improve the probability of you getting the cards you want for the effect you wanted. For example:
Multiple copies of Assassinate and Burning Soul for example, both gives +Attack and having 6 cards in a 20 card deck improves the chance for you to deal higher damage.
and yet whats so unfair about it nothing if you cant build a good deck don't blame the odds that's all i can say
Dernière modification par jackal19 (06-03-2012 11:32:36)
New englishchat: http://xat.com/EnglisheredanNeo---Online
"Tea is best enjoyed with your fellow monsters"
-Frederica Bernkastel
Hors ligne
magius a écrit :jackal19 a écrit :oh dont mind him ttpk hes intellect is way superior to us lowbies so he doesnt know what hes talking about
What he said is true. A good deck building is to improve the probability of you getting the cards you want for the effect you wanted. For example:
Multiple copies of Assassinate and Burning Soul for example, both gives +Attack and having 6 cards in a 20 card deck improves the chance for you to deal higher damage.
and yet whats so unfair about it nothing if you cant build a good deck don't blame the odds that's all i can say
Tell that to whitepaladin
Magius [FH] FullHouse Clan
Hors ligne
jackal19 a écrit :magius a écrit :What he said is true. A good deck building is to improve the probability of you getting the cards you want for the effect you wanted. For example:
Multiple copies of Assassinate and Burning Soul for example, both gives +Attack and having 6 cards in a 20 card deck improves the chance for you to deal higher damage.
and yet whats so unfair about it nothing if you cant build a good deck don't blame the odds that's all i can say
Tell that to whitepaladin
and you forgot the other one
New englishchat: http://xat.com/EnglisheredanNeo---Online
"Tea is best enjoyed with your fellow monsters"
-Frederica Bernkastel
Hors ligne
play TG and use litany+ supplication, and screw the random system yourself
Hors ligne
Sounds like you need lots of luck, try 3x [card]Lucky charm[/card] and feel the awesomeness to always hit Max attack ^^
Stop licking your wound, and start licking mine little puppies
Hors ligne
You can also play [card]Oh, I'm good! [/card], no more random....
Collectionneur de cartes
Hors ligne
The game is programmed this way - the percentage of performing min attack is way higher than max. The characters perform max attack 5-10% of the time.
Other random effect like sared nova or Dhan are equally distributed.
Hors ligne
The game is programmed this way - the percentage of performing min attack is way higher than max. The characters perform max attack 5-10% of the time.
Other random effect like sared nova or Dhan are equally distributed.
Unless this is backed by Feerik programmer, I doubt this is the case. Random generator is well... pseudo-random. I don't see why I want to make things harder by skewing the statistics for min/max attack.
Dernière modification par magius (06-03-2012 15:06:53)
Magius [FH] FullHouse Clan
Hors ligne
The game is programmed this way - the percentage of performing min attack is way higher than max. The characters perform max attack 5-10% of the time.
Other random effect like sared nova or Dhan are equally distributed.
No way, I wonder where you get this information...
My sources in developer team say that the random system uses standard pseudo-random methods available in the programming language used.
Collectionneur de cartes
Hors ligne
paulhealth a écrit :The game is programmed this way - the percentage of performing min attack is way higher than max. The characters perform max attack 5-10% of the time.
Other random effect like sared nova or Dhan are equally distributed.No way, I wonder where you get this information...
My sources in developer team say that the random system uses standard pseudo-random methods available in the programming language used.
i pick zurga's opinion over any random joe anyday..
i <3 ZIL
new telendar = fail, gimme a new one!
Hors ligne
Zurga a écrit :paulhealth a écrit :The game is programmed this way - the percentage of performing min attack is way higher than max. The characters perform max attack 5-10% of the time.
Other random effect like sared nova or Dhan are equally distributed.No way, I wonder where you get this information...
My sources in developer team say that the random system uses standard pseudo-random methods available in the programming language used.i pick zurga's opinion over any random joe anyday..
I'd believe him even if he says the world is a giant square instead of a sphere, with unicorns on the other side of the globe and dragons up above the sky...as long as all those relate to eredan
Hors ligne
lol just get a golem up to a 20+ attk and you dont have to worry about minimums and maximums lol
Hors ligne
oh dont mind him ttpk hes intellect is way superior to us lowbies so he doesnt know what hes talking about
I don't know if I should be offended or not, trying to calculate and generate the best odds isn't really rocket science.
There is never a matter of feeling superior if I don't agree with something: Most stuff that is written which I don't agree with could have easily been avoided if the persons complaining actually owned the deck to see what they write is mere bullocks.
Hors ligne
My sources in developer team say...
Do you really, with all your heart, believe anything the developers tell you?
Hors ligne
Zurga a écrit :My sources in developer team say...
Do you really, with all your heart, believe anything the developers tell you?
And who you are to declare that the developer's team are liars ?
Did you have proof of what you said ?
Oh, I forgot about the worldwide conspiracy against you...
Dernière modification par Zurga (06-03-2012 17:16:34)
Collectionneur de cartes
Hors ligne
paulhealth a écrit :Zurga a écrit :My sources in developer team say...
Do you really, with all your heart, believe anything the developers tell you?
And who you are to declare that the developer's team are liars ?
Did you have proof of what you said ?
Oh, I forgot about the worldwide conspiracy against you...
Zurga 1, Paulhealth 0
~Today is the tomorrow that you worried about yesterday~
Hors ligne