Vous n'êtes pas identifié(e).
Eredan iTCG forums move. You can find them at this adress: http://forums.eredan.com/index.php.
Eredan GT forums stay here, the same for the old Eredan iTCG forums who pass in read only.
Les forums d'Eredan iTCG ont déménagés. Retrouvez-les à cette adresse : http://forums.eredan.com/index.php.
Les forums d'Eredan GT restent ici, ainsi que les anciens forums d'Eredan iTCG qui y seront toujours en lecture seule.
I've been examining these two at level 3 upgrade and what it takes to get there. To make Warrior Level 3 it takes 1 flail to combine at level 2, that's it.
To make King level 3, it costs 2 Swords of the 5 Elder plus your level 3 warrior.
Warrior level 3 stats:
6/7 Attack
4 Defense
13 Health
King Level 3 stats:
6/9 Attack
3 Defense
14 Health
My question is, is it really worth it to have to buy 3 swords (so you will still have one to use) just to add one health +2 max attack but lose 1 defense?
It seems to me that when equipped with Sword of the 5 Elders, these two are basically equal. If I am not using a mercenary deck, is there any benefit at all of making the level 3 king?
I really think for the cost of making it, the level 3 king is way underpowered. Attack and/or Defense should be higher. That's my 2 cents.
Hors ligne
If you don't use Aez in a mercenary deck there is 1 reason for using the King instead of the Wandering warrior.
As you noticed the big deal about using Aez is the Sword of the 5 elders.... and the King has "Gain chain if you play a sword." while the Wandering Warrior has "Gain chain if you play a flail"
That and the +0/2 attack compared to the Wandering Warrior that you already stated.
Dernière modification par Seraph (16-10-2010 15:35:36)
Hors ligne
IMO aez is for full mercenary decks, otherwise there are better options other than him.
Dernière modification par paperbagdemon (17-10-2010 07:08:36)
hell is when you drew 3 arcaniums at round 1
Hors ligne