"since they think new guilds will be awesome why not make them spend all this money but ACTUALLY make the new guilds suck this time? that way we can boost them in 2 weeks times to make them the top ELO decks THUS making our player base spend MORE money! perfect strategy! in terms of business anyway...."

very good feerik. so will this runic legion release be able to counter wild buds? mercenaries? zil? eclipse? discards? all in a single guild stroke?

....

.....

doubtful. In my opinion, most of these uninformed players are thinking "wow new guild, I'm so gonna buy a hundreds boosters so I will be the best!" well think again...

remember when pirates came out? yep they sucked...

remember when nehantists came out? yep they sucked....

remember when ELO was balanced? ....

wait...

sorry stumped me on that one. anyone have 500 bucks to spend? yea? ok you win! lol!

soulst3al3r · 18-04-2012 04:10:57

so sick of of your posts...

Norad IV · 18-04-2012 04:11:23

soulst3al3r a écrit :

so sick of of your posts...

feel free not to reply or look at them, you know my name

Ryken · 18-04-2012 04:27:14

Norad IV a écrit :

since sapphon edited my previous posts I'd like to give you my reasons in a more "civilized" manner.
nomad release? sure good, top elo.
sap heart release? same
but wait... feerik realized something...
"since they think new guilds will be awesome why not make them spend all this money but ACTUALLY make the new guilds suck this time? that way we can boost them in 2 weeks times to make them the top ELO decks THUS making our player base spend MORE money! perfect strategy! in terms of business anyway...."
very good feerik. so will this runic legion release be able to counter wild buds? mercenaries? zil? eclipse? discards? all in a single guild stroke?

....

.....

doubtful. In my opinion, most of these uninformed players are thinking "wow new guild, I'm so gonna buy a hundreds boosters so I will be the best!" well think again...
remember when pirates came out? yep they sucked...
remember when nehantists came out? yep they sucked....
remember when ELO was balanced? ....
wait...
sorry stumped me on that one. anyone have 500 bucks to spend? yea? ok you win! lol!

OOOH! You got them. Now they'll have to think of new ways to make money off the people that play this game that is free until one CHOOSES to pay!!

Norad, you CRAFTY DEVIL, you did it again!!

/sarcasm

MrLordi92 · 18-04-2012 04:27:52

Isn't it sort of assumed something new won't be good? Without enough time to settle in and get more than a weeks worth of cards, how can they be ELO playable? Obvious post is quite obvious.

Santuros · 18-04-2012 06:28:52

your arguments don't have solid basis

Zurga · 18-04-2012 08:36:32

Norad IV a écrit :

nomad release? sure good, top elo.
sap heart release? same
remember when pirates came out? yep they sucked...
remember when nehantists came out? yep they sucked....

OK :
nomads : http://blogus.eredan.com/index.php/2010 … -du-desert
Really, they suck at this time. Noz wasn't good against them, but Zil and Kotoba rules on every nomad deck, top ELO ? not a chance.

Sap Heart : http://blogus.eredan.com/index.php/2010 … eve-est-la
Really, they suck, nothing good to do, no Elfine deck with Kei'zan, No Hom'chai IHAS, no multi-race, nothing.
Only three wheels decks, always missing something.

Pirates : http://blogus.eredan.com/index.php/2010 … nd-pirates
Very good Powder deck at this time.
Powder decks have rule on everything in the first 2 weeks, no-one know how to manages these type of deck.

Nehantists : http://blogus.eredan.com/index.php/2011 … e-returned
Very good corruption deck.
Early adopters have made a lot of good result even in ELO with this deck.

So, all you say is just wrong.

Please avoid big conspiracy thread...
Reading each post that Feerik is just a bad company willing to drain all your money is just painful.

magius · 18-04-2012 09:01:50

OH... MY... GOD... All these arguments are not even an argument but ranting of an unsatisfied player, who should leave if he has so many negative points about this game.

Any new guild will need time to settle into the game. It takes time to evolve a guild and its mechanics.

Points to stress: It is a GAME... YOU can choose to pay or not and it is YOUR choice to play this game. Take it or leave it. Gawd... your posts so far are just a ranting spree.

Dernière modification par magius (18-04-2012 09:15:28)

Sapphon · 18-04-2012 10:39:03

We... we're done. Norad IV has read all our plans. There is no point in going any further. Because of this great hero, we won't be able to dominate the world. I have to inform Feerik's higher authorities !

magius · 18-04-2012 10:46:06

Sapphon a écrit :

We... we're done. Norad IV has read all our plans. There is no point in going any further. Because of this great hero, we won't be able to dominate the world. I have to inform Feerik's higher authorities !

Have your secret dungeon and Lodir the Belly-Dancer ready!!

Sapphon · 18-04-2012 10:48:05

Yep. Amnezy won't be happy. I hope noone plans to go to Feerik Island this year

Ryken · 18-04-2012 11:47:57

Sapphon a écrit :

Yep. Amnezy won't be happy. I hope noone plans to go to Feerik Island this year

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!

jackal19 · 18-04-2012 14:45:16

i still find it odd that this little troll isnt banned yet since he is obviously that guy using an alt name that got banned a few years ago

Dernière modification par jackal19 (18-04-2012 14:46:03)

magius · 18-04-2012 16:04:33

jackal19 a écrit :

i still find it odd that this little troll isnt banned yet since he is obviously that guy using an alt name that got banned a few years ago

He Who Must Not Be Named... I remember that guy O.o

Col.Beowulf · 18-04-2012 16:10:05

magius a écrit :

jackal19 a écrit :
i still find it odd that this little troll isnt banned yet since he is obviously that guy using an alt name that got banned a few years ago
He Who Must Not Be Named... I remember that guy O.o

Must have been before my time. What made him so bad?

jackal19 · 18-04-2012 16:18:31

Col.Beowulf a écrit :

magius a écrit :
jackal19 a écrit :
i still find it odd that this little troll isnt banned yet since he is obviously that guy using an alt name that got banned a few years ago
He Who Must Not Be Named... I remember that guy O.o
Must have been before my time. What made him so bad?

lets just say his posts can be quite insulting like it questions your I.Q.

Stormholt · 18-04-2012 16:51:56

soulst3al3r a écrit :

so sick of of your posts...

2 >.>

DaRkStAr666 · 18-04-2012 16:54:58

Sapphon a écrit :

We... we're done. Norad IV has read all our plans. There is no point in going any further. Because of this great hero, we won't be able to dominate the world. I have to inform Feerik's higher authorities !

i lol'd hard!

MrLordi92 · 18-04-2012 18:17:08

Sapphon a écrit :

We... we're done. Norad IV has read all our plans. There is no point in going any further. Because of this great hero, we won't be able to dominate the world. I have to inform Feerik's higher authorities !

That awkward moment when the staff trolls you. Nice one, Sapphon.

Norad IV · 20-04-2012 03:57:57

ok it's true I can be ... obtuse in my reasoning. but I'm sure most players that have been playing over a year can see my points. I've gathered a lot of fans (trolls) that try to put me down but I'm sure they realize their posts are as meaningless as they think my posts are.

However I sent an email to zurga and sapphon apologizing for my more obscene outbursts and am trying to make an attempt to not be so stupid with what I say. yes a lot of my posts are geared towards imbalanced decks or obvious money grabs, but I feel I make very valid points whether you think so or not otherwise.

I have definitely cut down on the cursing, and when a mod edits my post I know I obviously said something too extreme and try to learn from my mistakes.

on another note, I haven't seen any runic legion in the 1800+ range yet.

and btw those who think I was banned on another name, you must've not been around when the renegade "bleachman" mod was around. He spent thousands of dollars on this game so he thought he was god pretty much. the only reason my other name got banned was cause I told him to not be such a troll and he didn't like it when someone stood up against him, so with all this power and money he tattle telled to feerik and got me banned.

that point aside, I feel all these mods do a great job (cause I am not the only one where they edit posts). Yes I am a very blunt person, and yes it does offend some people. But let me remind you I spent over 200 dollars on this game and have done countless ad offers so i have made feerik some money. does this mean I can act like a fool? no.

the point is I try to point out obvious trends or imbalanced cards. am I nice about it? not really, as a paying customer I expect the devs to take input from their money sources (people). so far I have not seen it.

but that is my opinion. hopefully I can try to make more constructive posts in the future.

Zurga · 20-04-2012 09:13:20

Norad IV a écrit :

However I sent an email to zurga and sapphon apologizing for my more obscene outbursts and am trying to make an attempt to not be so stupid with what I say. yes a lot of my posts are geared towards imbalanced decks or obvious money grabs, but I feel I make very valid points whether you think so or not otherwise.

Send it again, I have nothing in my mailbox.

By the way, multi-account are not allowed in game or on the forum.
Perhaps, should I ban you again.

Zurga · 20-04-2012 09:48:13

So, after some discussion between the moderation team.
We never had before the absolute proof that Norad IV and Apoth were the same person.
This last post is explicit enough and the sanction for Apoth remain.

So Norad IV is banned permanently of the forum.

Multi-account are not allowed on the forum nor in game.

However, we can reconsider this point with Apoth/Norad IV but all discussion on this subject will be done privately by email with Sapphon.

magius · 20-04-2012 10:17:20

Zurga a écrit :

So, after some discussion between the moderation team.
We never had before the absolute proof that Norad IV and Apoth were the same person.
This last post is explicit enough and the sanction for Apoth remain.
So Norad IV is banned permanently of the forum.
Multi-account are not allowed on the forum nor in game.
However, we can reconsider this point with Apoth/Norad IV but all discussion on this subject will be done privately by email with Sapphon.

You must not name HE WHO MUST NOT BE NAMED

But on a serious note, it is not hard to deduce his identity based on his vendetta against bleachman and his behaviour of not welcoming other people's view on subject matter.

Dernière modification par magius (20-04-2012 10:18:10)

Zurga · 20-04-2012 10:38:05

There were clues, but no proof.
It seems that in our countries, you're presumed innocent until you're found guilty.

Here we have an undeniable proof.

magius · 20-04-2012 11:25:57

Zurga a écrit :

There were clues, but no proof.
It seems that in our countries, you're presumed innocent until you're found guilty.
Here we have an undeniable proof.

I am just wondering if you have the ability to check IP addresses in this forum? Shouldn't that be a criteria when creating username?

Eredan's World

Annonce

#1 18-04-2012 04:09:35

to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good *at first*

#2 18-04-2012 04:10:57

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good *at first*

#3 18-04-2012 04:11:23

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good *at first*

#4 18-04-2012 04:27:14

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good *at first*

#5 18-04-2012 04:27:52

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good *at first*

#6 18-04-2012 06:28:52

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good *at first*

#7 18-04-2012 08:36:32

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good *at first*

#8 18-04-2012 09:01:50

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good *at first*

#9 18-04-2012 10:39:03

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good *at first*

#10 18-04-2012 10:46:06

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good *at first*

#11 18-04-2012 10:48:05

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good *at first*

#12 18-04-2012 11:47:57

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good *at first*

#13 18-04-2012 14:45:16

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good *at first*

#14 18-04-2012 16:04:33

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good *at first*

#15 18-04-2012 16:10:05

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good *at first*

#16 18-04-2012 16:18:31

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good *at first*

#17 18-04-2012 16:51:56

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good *at first*

#18 18-04-2012 16:54:58

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good *at first*

#19 18-04-2012 18:17:08

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good *at first*

#20 20-04-2012 03:57:57

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good *at first*

#21 20-04-2012 09:13:20

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good *at first*

#22 20-04-2012 09:48:13

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good *at first*

#23 20-04-2012 10:17:20

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good *at first*

#24 20-04-2012 10:38:05

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good *at first*

#25 20-04-2012 11:25:57

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good *at first*

Pied de page des forums

to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good at first

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good at first

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good at first

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good at first

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good at first

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good at first

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good at first

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good at first

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good at first

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good at first

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good at first

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good at first

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good at first

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good at first

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good at first

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good at first

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good at first

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good at first

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good at first

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good at first

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good at first

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good at first

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good at first

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good at first

Re : to reiterate, this is why "runic legion" won't be good at first