Annonce

Eredan iTCG forums move. You can find them at this adress: http://forums.eredan.com/index.php.

Eredan GT forums stay here, the same for the old Eredan iTCG forums who pass in read only.

Les forums d'Eredan iTCG ont déménagés. Retrouvez-les à cette adresse : http://forums.eredan.com/index.php.

Les forums d'Eredan GT restent ici, ainsi que les anciens forums d'Eredan iTCG qui y seront toujours en lecture seule.

Pages : 1

#1 03-01-2011 12:39:07

silversaint
Habitant de Guem
Inscription : 08-12-2010
Messages : 189

Ice Shield Vs Good Jorusien

so, good jorusien supposed to reduced the damage of the ice shield right?
but i still get the damage while equipping good jorusien


Hors ligne

#2 03-01-2011 14:23:45

skinnyeddie
Habitant de Guem
Inscription : 05-12-2010
Messages : 111

Re : Ice Shield Vs Good Jorusien

It's not a bug. Good Jorusien reduces damage. Ice Shield is loss of health just like Hasna's ability.


Hors ligne

#3 03-01-2011 14:52:10

silversaint
Habitant de Guem
Inscription : 08-12-2010
Messages : 189

Re : Ice Shield Vs Good Jorusien

seems the same to me...


Hors ligne

#4 03-01-2011 15:05:10

Mike_Magnus
Campeur
Inscription : 12-10-2010
Messages : 60

Re : Ice Shield Vs Good Jorusien

Think of Ice Shield as damage that cannot be reduced


Hors ligne

#5 03-01-2011 15:33:18

kappa1uk
Campeur
Inscription : 07-09-2010
Messages : 85

Re : Ice Shield Vs Good Jorusien

This is not actually the case - as a good Jorusien will reduce the effects of cards like Tea Ceremony or at least it used too.

Was the Ice shield already on the character when you played your Jorusien - If so you would already have received damage prior to the Jorusiens effect becoming active.

Pop in and say Hi to the English Speaking population of Eredan.
Live chat for all comers. http://xat.com/EredanUnite


Hors ligne

#6 03-01-2011 16:07:55

asdfgadsfz12
Voyageur
Inscription : 01-12-2010
Messages : 49

Re : Ice Shield Vs Good Jorusien

Juro reduce any source of damage.  When I had 2 of it on my Foam Giant and I entered battle against Kimiko, it shows I've taken 2 direct damage, but I lost 0 health.


Hors ligne

#7 04-01-2011 02:31:05

skinnyeddie
Habitant de Guem
Inscription : 05-12-2010
Messages : 111

Re : Ice Shield Vs Good Jorusien

I'm thinking Feerik should standardize the terminology in the cards.


Hors ligne

#8 04-01-2011 02:50:33

silversaint
Habitant de Guem
Inscription : 08-12-2010
Messages : 189

Re : Ice Shield Vs Good Jorusien

@kappa: yes, Both were active, i'm sure because it was 2nd turn when my char face his char...
@skinnyeddie: agree with u. i hope there will be some change after this...


Hors ligne

#9 04-01-2011 09:49:14

silversaint
Habitant de Guem
Inscription : 08-12-2010
Messages : 189

Re : Ice Shield Vs Good Jorusien

just notice, static charge also not affected by jorusien =='


Hors ligne

#10 04-01-2011 10:50:52

skinnyeddie
Habitant de Guem
Inscription : 05-12-2010
Messages : 111

Re : Ice Shield Vs Good Jorusien

silversaint a écrit :

just notice, static charge also not affected by jorusien =='

That's just whacked. Static charge clearly states "magic damage."


Hors ligne

#11 04-01-2011 12:24:09

silversaint
Habitant de Guem
Inscription : 08-12-2010
Messages : 189

Re : Ice Shield Vs Good Jorusien

jorusien supposed to reduce both magic damage and phys damage rite?


Hors ligne

#12 04-01-2011 12:38:44

skinnyeddie
Habitant de Guem
Inscription : 05-12-2010
Messages : 111

Re : Ice Shield Vs Good Jorusien

silversaint a écrit :

jorusien supposed to reduce both magic damage and phys damage rite?

Yep. It just says damage. That should cover both types.


Hors ligne

#13 05-01-2011 17:57:41

silversaint
Habitant de Guem
Inscription : 08-12-2010
Messages : 189

Re : Ice Shield Vs Good Jorusien

then feerik REEALY should fix this problem, and fix any sentences/words that give some misleading...


Hors ligne

Pages : 1

Pied de page des forums