Eredan's World

Br10nac · 26-09-2011 06:22:53

When Alishk (Dragon) plays crystalization, a character hitting him physically GAINS attack.

This doesn't seem right and i wonder if Ishia could play crystal, would the effect be similar?

blackwaltz · 26-09-2011 06:45:11

Br10nac a écrit :

When Alishk (Dragon) plays crystalization, a character hitting him physically GAINS attack.
This doesn't seem right and i wonder if Ishia could play crystal, would the effect be similar?

Alishk (dragon) adds 2 to dragonic spell effects right? So, using math to explain what happens when he plays crystallization: -1 + 2 = 1.
And if Ish plays that nothing happens.

Dernière modification par blackwaltz (26-09-2011 06:48:21)

Br10nac · 28-09-2011 00:11:43

I just thinks its a bad way to have done it is all

ZeroClass · 28-09-2011 04:53:55

lol XD worst than dhan effect XD

magius · 28-09-2011 07:08:16

To be honest, this is one of the weird mechanism of the game. The character ability technically should 'improve' the effects of spell. In this case, it should be -3 to attack. And it is not hard to code that really :S others would say it is maths. But with the right wording and coding, it is easy to make things consistent.

Zurga · 28-09-2011 09:32:53

This effect is intended.
It is not a bad coding or bad wording.
This is the same effect with Ishaia and [card]philosophical debate[/card] : -1 +1 = 0

This effect is really the effect intended, no bug here.

Dernière modification par Zurga (28-09-2011 09:33:33)

MrLordi92 · 28-09-2011 17:17:34

Zurga a écrit :

This effect is intended.
It is not a bad coding or bad wording.
This is the same effect with Ishaia and [card]philosophical debate[/card] : -1 +1 = 0
This effect is really the effect intended, no bug here.

Even though that's intended, it's really silly (For lack of a more abrasive word.)

Not only that, it's confusing. Looking at the cards I'd assume that it would make he character lose more attack, not gain one. Who would want that? I can't think of one game where I was looking at The Shadow and thought, (playing mages, too, mind you.) "Man, if only she had one more attack."

What's the reasoning behind such silly 'intended' effects? Why have them?

Zurga · 28-09-2011 17:22:57

Do you really think that a card that make Attack -3 twice (you can have two of them played at the same time) and permanent and each time you hit, you received another -3 permanent is a balanced one ?

In the current version, yes, it is balanced.
You do not use this card with Alishk or Ishaia.

MrLordi92 · 28-09-2011 18:48:54

Zurga a écrit :

Do you really think that a card that make Attack -3 twice (you can have two of them played at the same time) and permanent and each time you hit, you received another -3 permanent is a balanced one ?
In the current version, yes, it is balanced.
You do not use this card with Alishk or Ishaia.

I never said it was balanced, I simply said it's silly and confusing.

Besides, you already have a ton of broken card interactions, what's one more?

Eredan's World

Annonce

#1 26-09-2011 06:22:53

Alishk: Crystalization

#2 26-09-2011 06:45:11

Re : Alishk: Crystalization

#3 28-09-2011 00:11:43

Re : Alishk: Crystalization

#4 28-09-2011 04:53:55

Re : Alishk: Crystalization

#5 28-09-2011 07:08:16

Re : Alishk: Crystalization

#6 28-09-2011 09:32:53

Re : Alishk: Crystalization

#7 28-09-2011 17:17:34

Re : Alishk: Crystalization

#8 28-09-2011 17:22:57

Re : Alishk: Crystalization

#9 28-09-2011 18:48:54

Re : Alishk: Crystalization

Pied de page des forums