iQuit a écrit :
Malyss sucks hard ...
Tsuro is better
Wrong. Do you know how fun it is to double Katamaru with 6 Spirt? Plus he offers much needed protection to your other Trackers. Maylss makes Trackers less of a Glass Cannon deck.
Tsuro is too frail. He has 1 defense and 13 Health. Yeah, he attacks for a ton, but don't expect him to stay around too long. Zil Marauders eat Tsuro for breakfast.

I agree to what you say .... malyss is a vital character in trackers in other situations you need mage to kill an opponent specially armor decks, or the foam deck

MrLordi92 · 10-09-2011 16:07:18

ZeroClass a écrit :

MrLordi92 a écrit :
iQuit a écrit :
Malyss sucks hard ...
Tsuro is better
Wrong. Do you know how fun it is to double Katamaru with 6 Spirt? Plus he offers much needed protection to your other Trackers. Maylss makes Trackers less of a Glass Cannon deck.
Tsuro is too frail. He has 1 defense and 13 Health. Yeah, he attacks for a ton, but don't expect him to stay around too long. Zil Marauders eat Tsuro for breakfast.
I agree to what you say .... malyss is a vital character in trackers in other situations you need mage to kill an opponent specially armor decks, or the foam deck

Wait..... You've been using Maylss to do magical damage? Why? And the Foam decks aren't extremely difficult if you're lucky enough to get double Kunai to take out his items.

jackal19 · 10-09-2011 16:15:22

MrLordi92 a écrit :

ZeroClass a écrit :
MrLordi92 a écrit :
Wrong. Do you know how fun it is to double Katamaru with 6 Spirt? Plus he offers much needed protection to your other Trackers. Maylss makes Trackers less of a Glass Cannon deck.
Tsuro is too frail. He has 1 defense and 13 Health. Yeah, he attacks for a ton, but don't expect him to stay around too long. Zil Marauders eat Tsuro for breakfast.
I agree to what you say .... malyss is a vital character in trackers in other situations you need mage to kill an opponent specially armor decks, or the foam deck
Wait..... You've been using Maylss to do magical damage? Why? And the Foam decks aren't extremely difficult if you're lucky enough to get double Kunai to take out his items.

Theres nothing wrong with malyss using magic attack True malyss does wonders when he uses katamaru but he does come in handy in high def decks for example kot warriors as he can use rods or i find it better if he just uses magic attack chained with a katamaru

Dernière modification par jackal19 (10-09-2011 16:16:44)

MrLordi92 · 11-09-2011 01:12:08

jackal19 a écrit :

MrLordi92 a écrit :
ZeroClass a écrit :
I agree to what you say .... malyss is a vital character in trackers in other situations you need mage to kill an opponent specially armor decks, or the foam deck
Wait..... You've been using Maylss to do magical damage? Why? And the Foam decks aren't extremely difficult if you're lucky enough to get double Kunai to take out his items.
Theres nothing wrong with malyss using magic attack True malyss does wonders when he uses katamaru but he does come in handy in high def decks for example kot warriors as he can use rods or i find it better if he just uses magic attack chained with a katamaru

I've never thought to use Rain of Death, mostly because I can't afford them. The only thing I don't like about that is then Maylss wouldn't be able to attack that turn.

iQuit · 11-09-2011 06:24:33

I feel Malyss is belong to human tracker , 2/7 attack is just so bad .
I love the damage reduction but his attack point is so bad

Btw , Offensive ( this week trophy card ) is good in tracker deck , specially when you use it on first turn Hime or Shui Khan

Dernière modification par iQuit (11-09-2011 06:30:00)

jackal19 · 11-09-2011 10:36:56

iQuit a écrit :

I feel Malyss is belong to human tracker , 2/7 attack is just so bad .
I love the damage reduction but his attack point is so bad
Btw , Offensive ( this week trophy card ) is good in tracker deck , specially when you use it on first turn Hime or Shui Khan

well malyss belongs and rules at guem version i find it more stable than human version imo

p90miki · 16-09-2011 08:37:23

If you wont play-for-fun deck try "anti-mage" deck or "anti-discard"
i prefer anti-mage it is very fun to play whit it ,but have problem whit discard deck.

Limestone · 16-09-2011 09:05:49

p90miki a écrit :

If you wont play-for-fun deck try "anti-mage" deck or "anti-discard"
i prefer anti-mage it is very fun to play whit it ,but have problem whit discard deck.

Best anti-mage = Discard , since when discard was considered as being fun?

p90miki · 16-09-2011 09:57:50

Limestone a écrit :

p90miki a écrit :
If you wont play-for-fun deck try "anti-mage" deck or "anti-discard"
i prefer anti-mage it is very fun to play whit it ,but have problem whit discard deck.
Best anti-mage = Discard , since when discard was considered as being fun?

i sad anti-mage not discard and i mean mages to feel useless.

Limestone · 16-09-2011 16:19:50

p90miki a écrit :

Limestone a écrit :
p90miki a écrit :
If you wont play-for-fun deck try "anti-mage" deck or "anti-discard"
i prefer anti-mage it is very fun to play whit it ,but have problem whit discard deck.
Best anti-mage = Discard , since when discard was considered as being fun?
i sad anti-mage not discard and i mean mages to feel useless.

I have yet to see a deck that can hamper mages to the extent of 'useless' level. Even noz mages can terribly hurt discard with their little bit whacko spells.

kkjamin · 16-09-2011 21:58:17

Limestone a écrit :

p90miki a écrit :
If you wont play-for-fun deck try "anti-mage" deck or "anti-discard"
i prefer anti-mage it is very fun to play whit it ,but have problem whit discard deck.
Best anti-mage = Discard , since when discard was considered as being fun?

Either being fun or not is not a fact, it is one's opinion.

Also tracker decks are pretty anti-mage. I have played against noz mage decks with my human and guem tracker decks and have won about 80% of the time.
Not really to "useless" tho. I agree to that

Dracatis · 16-09-2011 22:37:11

You can try my pirate deck I posted in the "Pirate Lightning Mages" thread, it's an anti-mage deck and features Thunder King and Captian Killicrew(-spirit).

MrLordi92 · 17-09-2011 04:11:08

Dracatis a écrit :

You can try my pirate deck I posted in the "Pirate Lightning Mages" thread, it's an anti-mage deck and features Thunder King and Captian Killicrew(-spirit).

How is a deck that uses magical attacks Anti-Mage?

Limestone · 17-09-2011 12:27:52

Dracatis a écrit :

You can try my pirate deck I posted in the "Pirate Lightning Mages" thread, it's an anti-mage deck and features Thunder King and Captian Killicrew(-spirit).

Just because your deck lowers the opposing chars spirit by -1 doesn't grant it a 'mage-killer' status on your deck

iQuit · 18-09-2011 11:37:12

How much does a Craftman - Golem cost ? I 'm going to use Golemarok instead of Foam Giant .

Eredan's World

Annonce

#1 03-09-2011 15:12:24

having around 50k , need a fun-to-play deck

#2 03-09-2011 15:43:50

Re : having around 50k , need a fun-to-play deck

#3 04-09-2011 01:22:05

Re : having around 50k , need a fun-to-play deck

#4 04-09-2011 01:39:39

Re : having around 50k , need a fun-to-play deck

#5 04-09-2011 01:54:44

Re : having around 50k , need a fun-to-play deck

#6 04-09-2011 10:29:33

Re : having around 50k , need a fun-to-play deck

#7 05-09-2011 05:52:24

Re : having around 50k , need a fun-to-play deck

#8 07-09-2011 22:49:52

Re : having around 50k , need a fun-to-play deck

#9 10-09-2011 05:10:04

Re : having around 50k , need a fun-to-play deck

#10 10-09-2011 05:31:24

Re : having around 50k , need a fun-to-play deck

#11 10-09-2011 08:43:19

Re : having around 50k , need a fun-to-play deck

#12 10-09-2011 16:07:18

Re : having around 50k , need a fun-to-play deck

#13 10-09-2011 16:15:22

Re : having around 50k , need a fun-to-play deck

#14 11-09-2011 01:12:08

Re : having around 50k , need a fun-to-play deck

#15 11-09-2011 06:24:33

Re : having around 50k , need a fun-to-play deck

#16 11-09-2011 10:36:56

Re : having around 50k , need a fun-to-play deck

#17 16-09-2011 08:37:23

Re : having around 50k , need a fun-to-play deck

#18 16-09-2011 09:05:49

Re : having around 50k , need a fun-to-play deck

#19 16-09-2011 09:57:50

Re : having around 50k , need a fun-to-play deck

#20 16-09-2011 16:19:50

Re : having around 50k , need a fun-to-play deck

#21 16-09-2011 21:58:17

Re : having around 50k , need a fun-to-play deck

#22 16-09-2011 22:37:11

Re : having around 50k , need a fun-to-play deck

#23 17-09-2011 04:11:08

Re : having around 50k , need a fun-to-play deck

#24 17-09-2011 12:27:52

Re : having around 50k , need a fun-to-play deck

#25 18-09-2011 11:37:12

Re : having around 50k , need a fun-to-play deck

Pied de page des forums